[Salon] Winning the battle, losing the war



Winning the battle, losing the war

Summary: Israel has said it will win its war in Gaza and destroy Hamas; Tarek Megerisi dissects the three brutal scenarios by which Israel and Benjamin Netanyahu could claim a ‘win’.

In our 1 December podcast with the European Council on Foreign Relations’ Tarek Megerisi we focussed on the current situation in Libya. But before we did so we asked him about the war in Gaza. Here is what he said (you can find the podcast here.)

After the horrors of the 7 October Hamas attack we've seen the slaughter of now more than 14,000 Palestinians trapped in the Gaza Strip, another 200 killed in the West Bank, by the IDF and settler vigilantes. This is a war that Israel says it will win. Do you think it's winning? Do you think it can win?

I don't even know what win means anymore. To be honest, in this context. I think that if you look at the situation in front of us, there are probably three different definitions of winning, depending on which part of this wider alliance you ask, this group of the world's most technologically advanced states and militaries, who are currently pulverising the Gaza Strip. You know, the nicer face of this alliance, the United States of America, the Europeans they love to patronise us and tell us this is all about Israel's right to self-defence and that what Israel and the IDF are doing is carrying out a counterterrorism campaign. Under that narrative, I think winning is defined as completely removing Hamas from the Gaza Strip. It seems plausible, it seems something that most of us are familiar with, from previous campaigns against al Qaeda, against ISIS, and so on. And let's not get into the ironies of this as an objective. But if that is indeed the objective, then this is a very counterproductive approach to achieving it. After obliterating most of the built-up areas of Gaza, after committing atrocities, like forcefully shutting down hospitals, forcing babies to die in incubators, which is something I can't even believe I'm actually saying and just massacring large swathes of the population, you're only going to drive people towards Hamas, because they are an embedded resistance movement, whether we like it or not. And I think it says a lot that one month after what Hamas did, to massacre civilians in Israel in deeply distressing and inhuman ways - and I think that's something important to acknowledge, because there has been almost a counter narrative being produced to gloss over that - but despite all of that, to me, at least, it seems that Hamas are clearly winning the PR war here. And that should really spur a moment of self-reflection amongst the coalition because honestly how disgusting do your own actions have to be to start off from the point of October 7, and still look like the bad guy here.


The Israeli Defence Force is intensifying its operations in the southern Gaza Strip after a week-long pause in the war with Hamas [photo credit: IDF]

And the second definition of Israel winning Tarek?

The second definition of winning that I've discerned is the one that is espoused by large sections of Israel's extreme right wing government and its cultural establishment. And it's chilling, I think, if you note how much of that political and cultural establishment and even how many of the normal population of Israel just simply have no acknowledgement at all of the humanity of Palestinians. It's not even dehumanisation, it's almost like they consider them some kind of repulsive scourge that has to be extinguished. And if you look at the statements of these politicians and of these groups, it's really quite clear that what they want to do is to reclaim large chunks, if not all of the Gaza Strip and use the cover of this military response to Hamas in Gaza to also catalyse the ethnic cleansing of the West Bank. So basically, when the dust settles, they want to have seized as much land as possible in Palestine and killed or expelled as many Palestinians as possible. And as distressing as it is to say, that probably has a higher chance of success than the first definition of winning here. Because you know, the block on this happening is not the conscience of Israelis or any of their western partners and it's not their military capacity. They could probably do this overnight. The block is the political pressure that this activity is creating elsewhere in the global political system. Already large swathes of the world, from Chile to South Africa to Malaysia, are outraged  at what's happening. The Abraham Accords group is shaken, with the UAE and Saudi Arabia trying to lead the diplomatic push against what's going on. Even old allies like Jordan and Egypt - who have been at peace since the 70s - are being pushed into ever more desperate and hardline statements in a bid to stop this happening. So the Israelis keep pushing towards this barbaric goal. And if they do it too hard and too fast, it really could trigger a regional war and God knows where that leads.

You said three definitions of Israel winning, what’s the last one?

The last definition of winning, which is probably one that I don't hear discussed hardly at all, but it's worth being cognisant of, because it highlights how utterly depraved this whole thing is, is to make the case to say that this is all about Netanyahu saving his political skin. I mean, the guy was deeply unpopular to begin with. And then many blamed him for his failure to stop October 7 happening. And you know, Bibi, his whole shtick is that he would be the guy who stops a Palestinian state ever emerging by empowering Hamas against the Palestinian Authority, defending Hamas and neutralising any armed resistance to Israel by periodically mowing the lawn, which is this horrible clinical phrase for regularly killing armed resistance actors, for want of a better term, in order to manage them. And it's clear that after October 7, this policy has failed catastrophically. So right now, he knows that as soon as this war ends he's done for, the polling numbers are hugely stacked against him. So really, he feels like he has to keep waging a war until something that looks like either satisfying revenge or victory can be created, that would be sufficient for him to keep this Frankenstein's monster of a (government) coalition going on or to allow him to build a new one.

So yeah, I don't really know what winning looks like, it's probably healthier for us to focus on how this ends, which is that we just hope that the ceasefire continues, hostages continue to be released. And eventually there's too much inertia around the prolonged truce, and Netanyahu has too little political capital remaining to start up hostilities again. Because a real win here would be to stop October 7 happening again, or to stop the systematic massacre of Palestinians happening again. And the only way to do that is through a political settlement.

The podcast was recorded 30 November.  On 1 December Israel resumed its offensive targeting the southern Gaza Strip and the city of Khan Younis. Yesterday Al Jazeera reported the renewed offensive had already killed 700, taking the death toll in Gaza to more than 15000.


Members can leave comments about this newsletter on the Today's Newsletter page of the Arab Digest website
follow us on TwitterLinkedIn and Facebook

Copyright © 2023 Arab Digest, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email as you are subscribed to the Arab Digest.
Our mailing address is:
Arab Digest
3rd Floor
207 Regent Street
London, W1B 3HH
United Kingdom



 To unsubscribe from this list email editor@arabdigest.org


This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail (Mailman edition) and MHonArc.